The United Nations Security Council faced a tense session on Friday as members voted on a resolution that aimed to extend sanctions relief for Iran. The resolution, brought forward by China and Russia, sought to give six more months of breathing space under the 2015 nuclear deal. Supporters of the plan said the move would keep diplomacy alive at a critical moment.
The proposal, however, was rejected. Out of the 15 members of the council, only four voted in favor. Nine opposed it, and two abstained. Those in support included Algeria, China, Pakistan, and Russia. Countries that voted against included Denmark, France, Greece, Panama, Sierra Leone, Slovenia, Somalia, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Guyana and South Korea chose to abstain.
The failed resolution came just hours before sanctions were set to snap back into place. Britain, France, and Germany had triggered this mechanism earlier in the week after negotiations with Iran broke down. The snapback clause, written into the nuclear deal, allows sanctions to automatically return if one side is judged to be in breach of its commitments.
Iran and Russia agree on nuclear power project as United Nations sanctions approach
How the Vote Unfolded
The sharp divisions inside the Security Council were clear during the session. Dmitry Polyanskiy, the deputy Russian ambassador to the U.N., said Western nations had chosen pressure over diplomacy. He described their approach as blackmail and warned that it would only worsen tensions in the region.
On the other side, European nations defended their decision. They argued that Iran had not honored the terms of the 2015 agreement and that allowing sanctions relief to continue would reward non-compliance. Their stance was that pressure, rather than delay, was necessary to bring Iran back into serious negotiations.
Before the vote, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi held meetings with his French, German, and British counterparts. These discussions were aimed at finding common ground ahead of the council session. However, according to diplomats who were present, the meeting ended without any progress or new proposals. This lack of breakthrough added to the momentum behind the snapback decision.
Iran’s top leadership also made its stance clear during the week. Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei declared that the country would not surrender to international pressure. He said talks with the United States were a dead end and insisted that Iran would resist attempts to force concessions.
U.S. launches sweeping sanctions on Iranian crypto network moving $100 million in oil funds
What the Sanctions Mean
With the resolution rejected, the sanctions are now set to return in full force. These measures are significant and wide-ranging. They include freezing Iranian assets held abroad, blocking arms deals with Tehran, and penalizing any development linked to its ballistic missile program. The return of sanctions effectively reverses the relief granted under the 2015 agreement.
Iran’s president, Masoud Pezeshkian, responded to the outcome by calling the move unfair and illegal. He said it ignored the rights of the Iranian people and undermined the basis of international agreements. His comments reflected Tehran’s anger at the decision and its rejection of the snapback process.
For Iran, the loss of sanctions relief means renewed restrictions on trade and financial activity with the outside world. For the Security Council, the vote highlighted the growing divide between major powers. While Russia and China pushed for dialogue and delay, Western members insisted that firm action was required after months of stalled talks.
The failure of the resolution has now cleared the way for the automatic reimposition of sanctions. With no new agreement reached, the snapback clause will go into effect as written in the nuclear deal.