Unusual trade activity was seen in global markets early on a Monday, just minutes before a major social media post from the United States president on Truth Social regarding Iran. Large bursts of trading were recorded in oil futures and S&P 500 futures, which are financial contracts used to bet on future prices of oil and stock markets.
These trades took place shortly before a post stated that discussions with Iran were “very productive.” This marked a sharp change in tone compared to earlier warnings, where the president had said Iran could face strikes on its energy infrastructure if it did not reopen the Strait of Hormuz within a strict timeframe.
After the post, markets moved quickly. Oil prices dropped sharply while stock markets surged. Traders who placed positions before the announcement may have earned large profits, with estimates suggesting gains could have reached tens of millions of dollars based on market calculations shared by analysts.
Michael Lynch from Strategic Energy & Economic Research said the timing of the trades looked unusual, noting that such large activity right before major announcements is not commonly seen in oil markets.
Houthis issue warning over Red Sea use as US–Israel tensions with Iran grow
Lawmakers and Watchdogs Raise Questions Over Possible Insider Advantage
The timing of the trades has triggered concern among lawmakers, analysts, and ethics watchdogs, who are questioning whether some traders may have had access to non-public information. Jordan Libowitz from the ethics group CREW said the situation raises concerns about whether government actions are benefiting specific individuals instead of the public.
Democratic Senator Chris Murphy described the situation as “unbelievable corruption” and questioned who may have known about the developments before the public announcement. He raised concerns about whether individuals close to the administration could be involved.
Even some political opponents within the Republican side raised concerns. Jeremy Munson, a Republican Senate candidate in Minnesota, said anyone responsible for insider trading should be identified and held accountable.
Mark Neuman, chief investment officer at Hero Asset Management, said financial exchanges normally record detailed transaction data, meaning trades can often be traced back to individuals. He added that stronger regulation could improve transparency and trust in markets.
The White House has denied any wrongdoing, with a spokesperson stating there is no evidence linking officials to the trades and calling such suggestions “baseless and irresponsible.”
Iran sees $10 million crypto movement abroad during rising US–Israel tensions and conflict
Repeated Betting Surges and Growing Pressure on Regulators
This is not an isolated case, as similar patterns have been reported in prediction markets and geopolitical betting platforms. On Polymarket, six accounts reportedly made around 1.2 million US dollars by betting that the United States would carry out an attack involving Iran. Analytics firm Bubblemaps said these bets were placed just hours before public reports confirmed military action.
In another earlier case, an individual reportedly earned more than 400,000 US dollars after betting on political developments involving Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro shortly before major events occurred. These repeated incidents have increased scrutiny on prediction markets and fast-moving bets linked to global events.
Regulators including the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission did not respond to requests for comment. The Chicago Mercantile Exchange also declined to comment on the matter.
At the same time, a group of lawmakers has proposed banning betting on sensitive real-world events such as wars, government actions, and elections. The discussion continues alongside wider concerns raised by critics about crypto-related profits linked to political families and potential conflicts of interest.
Despite ongoing debate, there is still no evidence linking government officials to the trades, and the identities of those behind the unusual market activity remain unknown.