A partner at KPMG Australia was fined AUD 10,000 for using artificial intelligence (AI) to complete an internal AI ethics training test. The case has drawn widespread attention because it highlights the challenges companies face in ensuring ethical AI use in professional environments.
The partner uploaded the internal course materials from the AI ethics training to an AI platform, which then generated answers to complete the test quickly. While AI tools can be helpful for research, learning, and productivity, using them to bypass a required ethics assessment is considered cheating under KPMG’s policies.
Once the misuse was discovered, the partner was required to retake the AI ethics training. The fine and mandatory retake highlight the seriousness of using AI unethically, even in what might seem like a minor internal training exercise. Many have noted the irony: the partner failed an AI ethics test by relying on AI itself.
This case also serves as a reminder that even experienced senior professionals can make errors in judgment when tempted to take shortcuts using AI. KPMG’s response demonstrates the firm’s commitment to maintaining integrity, accountability, and professional standards across all levels of staff. By enforcing strict consequences, the company emphasizes that ethics and compliance are non-negotiable, regardless of rank or experience.
Fraud tourists used AI to fake records in $3.5 million Medicaid housing scam
Multiple Staff Attempted Similar Shortcuts
KPMG revealed that this was not an isolated incident. Around 24 staff members attempted to use AI tools to bypass internal assessments this year.
These incidents highlight the challenges companies face in maintaining assessment integrity, particularly in an era when AI can generate fast and often convincing answers. While artificial intelligence can support productivity and research, relying on it to complete tests or training programs violates company rules and undermines the purpose of internal ethics programs.
The company’s monitoring systems successfully identified these attempts, showing that KPMG actively enforces its policies on AI use. This serves as a cautionary example for employees at all levels that violating AI rules can result in serious consequences, including fines, mandatory retraining, and potential reputational implications within the organization.
Furthermore, the repeated attempts by multiple staff members indicate that some employees may not fully understand the boundaries of acceptable AI use. Organizations increasingly recognize the importance of clear communication of AI policies, combined with active monitoring, to prevent misuse and ensure employees act responsibly.
China Warns of AI Addiction as It Unveils Draft Rules for Human-Like Systems
KPMG’s proactive approach to enforcement reflects a broader trend in professional services: companies are taking ethical AI use seriously, especially when it involves internal training or compliance programs. Employees are expected to demonstrate integrity and responsibility, not just technical competence.
Corporate Ethics and AI Responsibility
The incident also highlights the importance of ethical AI practices in the workplace. As artificial intelligence becomes more integrated into daily professional tasks, companies must balance efficiency and innovation with ethics and accountability. KPMG’s enforcement measures highlight that internal rules are taken seriously and that staff must adhere to them, even for training exercises.
The case demonstrates that attempting to use AI to bypass corporate rules is unacceptable. It also emphasizes that companies must continuously educate staff on ethical AI practices, ensuring employees understand the limits of AI use in professional settings.
Ultimately, the KPMG incident illustrates a clear lesson: artificial intelligence should be used responsibly and ethically, even in situations that might seem low-risk, such as completing an internal training test. Attempting shortcuts or using AI to cheat can lead to serious professional consequences, reinforcing that ethics and compliance remain central to modern corporate environments.