In a recent case, Anne Mulloy, a 63-year-old woman from Fraserburgh, Aberdeenshire, has been sentenced to three years in prison for defrauding her friend, former Eastenders actress Helena Breck. The elaborate scam involved Mulloy convincing Breck to fund a fake documentary about Hillary Clinton’s 2016 US presidential campaign, promising insider access and other benefits that never materialized.
The Deception by Anne Mulloy Unfolds
Helena Breck, a familiar face to many from her brief role as Elizabeth Willmott-Brown in the BBC soap opera Eastenders and her recurring role in the 1980s series Triangle, was targeted by Mulloy over several years. From 2011 to 2017, Mulloy spun an intricate web of lies, repeatedly asking Breck for loans to cover various expenses related to the supposed documentary.
Anne Mulloy assured Breck that the funds were necessary for critical aspects of the film’s production, promising significant returns once the documentary was completed. However, there was no documentary. The entire scheme was a fabrication designed to exploit Breck’s trust and extract as much money as possible.
A Friend Exploited
At Peterhead Sheriff Court, Sheriff Craig Findlater described the fraud as “sustained” and “long-term,” noting that Mulloy had no intention of repaying the loans. The court heard that the original charge estimated the fraud at £85,000, but this was later amended by the Crown to an unspecified amount. The exact figure remains unclear, but it is evident that the financial impact on Breck was devastating.
During the trial, Breck recounted how she had trusted Anne Mulloy implicitly, never suspecting that her friend was deceiving her. Breck’s belief in the legitimacy of the project was bolstered by Mulloy’s detailed and convincing accounts of the progress being made, all of which were later revealed to be lies.
Legal Proceedings and Sentencing
Defense counsel Jordanna Blockley argued for a community sentence, citing Anne Mulloy’s significant health difficulties. However, Sheriff Findlater emphasized the severity of the fraud, its duration, and the substantial amount of money involved. He pointed out that Mulloy had a history of similar offenses, further justifying a custodial sentence.
Sheriff Findlater declared that only a prison sentence would be fitting in this case, given the magnitude of the fraud, the duration over which it occurred, and the effect on the victim. He handed down a three-year prison sentence to Mulloy, a verdict that Breck greeted with a sense of relief.
The Victim’s Perspective
During a conversation, Helena Breck revealed her mixed emotions of relief and continued anguish. She expressed a deep sense of relief that justice had, at last, been delivered. However, she voiced her grief over the financial wreckage caused by Anne Mulloy’s actions. “She has exhibited no regret for the trust she breached, the distress she inflicted, or the crimes she carried out.”
Conclusion
The sentencing of Anne Mulloy marks the end of a long and painful chapter for Helena Breck, who was deceived and financially devastated by someone she considered a friend. Mulloy’s actions were not just a breach of trust but a calculated exploitation that spanned several years, leaving Breck in a precarious financial situation. While the custodial sentence provides some measure of justice, the emotional and financial scars for Breck are likely to persist.
This case emphasizes the importance of vigilance and the need for protective measures against fraud, even in seemingly trustworthy relationships. It also serves as a reminder that fraudsters can come from any walk of life and that their schemes can be both elaborate and convincing. As Mulloy serves her time, it is hoped that her incarceration will prevent her from victimizing others and that her story will raise awareness about the dangers of fraud.