Proposed FATCA amendmends in 2019

More Articles

Mayur Joshi
Mayur Joshihttp://www.mayurjoshi.com
Mayur Joshi is a Contributing Editor at Regtechtimes, recognized for his authoritative reporting and analysis on financial crime, espionage, and global sanctions. His work combines investigative depth with geopolitical context, offering readers clear insights into the evolving landscape of compliance, risk, and international security. With a strong focus on sanctions imposed by OFAC and regulatory bodies across the US, UK, and Australia, Mayur is widely regarded as a subject-matter expert in the global sanctions ecosystem. He regularly contributes analysis on geopolitical developments—particularly China’s strategic influence, intelligence operations, and the shifting dynamics of global power. Mayur has authored seven books on financial crimes, money laundering, and corporate compliance, reinforcing his position as a leading voice in the regtech and financial intelligence community. He is also the architect of India’s first certification program in Anti-Money Laundering, a landmark initiative that helped shape professional AML training standards in the country. His recent work includes deep dives into sanctions regimes, illicit finance networks, state-sponsored espionage, and emerging threats across the global financial system, making him a trusted source for experts, journalists, and policymakers seeking clarity in a rapidly changing world.

Under FATCA and its implementing regulations, an entity is an “investment entity” (and, therefore, a financial institution potentially subject to FATCA) if the entity’s gross income is primarily attributable to investing, reinvesting or trading in financial assets and the entity is “managed by” certain specified entities (generally those in the banking or financial asset management business).  Under applicable regulations, “managed by” generally meant “discretionary management” over the assets of the investment entity.

The Proposed Regulations clarify that an entity will not be treated as an “investment entity” solely because it invests into a mutual fund or other pooled investment vehicle (i) that is widely held and (ii) where the financial institution offering interests in the vehicle does not have specific discretionary authority over the entity’s investment (for example, if the mutual fund offers shares to the public generally without a tailored investment mandate).

This change clarifies a question taxpayers had regarding when a vehicle investing in public funds could become subject to FATCA (solely by reason of those investment activities).

Latest

error: Content is protected !!