In recent months, significant regulatory developments have emerged from China and Hong Kong, particularly concerning AML law (anti-money laundering) and the burgeoning digital asset market. As both regions adapt to the challenges posed by rapidly evolving financial technologies, these regulatory changes signal a concerted effort to enhance oversight and safeguard against illicit activities.
China’s Revised AML Law
On September 9, 2024, Wang Xiang, a spokesperson for China’s Legislative Affairs Commission, announced potential revisions to the country’s AML law. These changes aim to address the increasing complexity of money laundering activities driven by technological advancements and innovative business models. The Chinese government has prosecuted 1,391 individuals for money laundering in the first half of 2024, highlighting the pressing need for reform.
The draft revision seeks to empower the central bank to issue guidelines aimed at monitoring new money laundering risks. Financial institutions will be required to assess and address risks linked to new business models. This proactive approach highlights a shift toward a more comprehensive understanding of money laundering, which now includes seven types of predicate offenses such as drug trafficking, human trafficking, corruption, fraud, and terrorist financing.
A significant component of the proposed revisions to the AML law is the acknowledgment of “virtual assets” as potential vehicles for money laundering. The Supreme People’s Court has indicated that these assets can obscure the origins of illicit funds, further complicating enforcement efforts. Under the new provisions, money laundering cases exceeding 5 million yuan (approximately $704,735) will face severe penalties, emphasizing the state’s commitment to tackling serious financial crimes.
Hong Kong’s New Licensing Regime
Contrastingly, Hong Kong is exploring a different regulatory path. As the only Chinese territory where digital assets are legally recognized, Hong Kong’s approach aims to create a structured environment for their use. The Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) is currently seeking feedback from industry stakeholders on a new licensing regime for over-the-counter (OTC) digital asset services. This would allow investors to buy and sell assets without relying on public exchanges.
Quad Issues Strong Message to China Over UNCLOS Violations
The proposed licensing framework would involve close collaboration between the SFC and the Customs and Excise Department (C&ED) to regulate OTC trading services effectively. This initiative reflects Hong Kong’s commitment to fostering a sustainable and responsible digital asset market while addressing potential risks associated with unregulated trading platforms.
In addition to OTC services, the SFC is also considering a licensing regime for digital asset custodian services, which would further enhance investor protection. The regulatory body has been proactive in identifying unlicensed entities targeting Hong Kong investors, maintaining an “Alert List” of suspected fraudulent platforms. As of August 2024, this list included 42 unlicensed digital asset exchanges, underscoring the ongoing risks in the market.
A Unified Approach to Regulation
Both China and Hong Kong’s regulatory shifts highlight a growing recognition of the need for a unified approach to tackling money laundering and ensuring the integrity of the financial system. While China focuses on tightening its AML law to address the risks posed by technological innovation, Hong Kong is working to create a regulatory environment that encourages responsible growth in the digital asset sector.
These developments are crucial for several reasons. First, they reflect an increasing global consensus on the importance of effective regulation in combating financial crime. As the digital landscape changes, the frameworks intended to regulate it must adapt as well. Second, by implementing robust AML laws, both regions aim to protect investors and maintain market integrity—essential components for fostering public trust in the financial system.
As the regulatory landscape in China and Hong Kong continues to evolve, the focus on AML law and digital assets will likely shape the future of financial services in both regions. The proposed changes signify a proactive stance against financial crime and a commitment to establishing a regulatory environment that promotes innovation while safeguarding the interests of investors. With these measures, both China and Hong Kong are setting a precedent for how jurisdictions can balance growth and regulation in the rapidly changing world of finance.
